One way to neutrally do this without POV concerns is to limit it to recurring characters regardless of being a hero or villain. Spidey 104 14:23, (UTC) I think we should refrain from creating an exhaustive list of characters. I don't care if they are listed as "Villains," "Antagonists," or something else, but they should be included. I feel that we should include a list of villains/antagonists in the template, because casual viewers of the films who don't know much about the comic books are likely to want to read about those characters as much as the stars of the films. J Greb ( talk) 03:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC) Villains/Antagonists Shall we correct to alphebetic or is there a better schema that does not rely on the reader having seen the films? "Primary", "Secondary", "Hero", "Villain", "Billing", "Number of appearances", "Screen time", etc mean, or should mean, nothing here. Keep in mind the 'box is not supposed to imply or present a "ranking" system. The intuitive listing is alphabetic or:Īnd that's without adding the few extended cast missing from each movie's cast. The "most part" bing that Fury has been listed second a long time though the character didn't appear until after the first film's credits and Cap who just got flipped from 2nd last to 2nd. For the most part they have been in order of first appearance. a fair thing to do with them.īut the characters. Right now the film, game, and soundtrack sections are kind of intuitively in release order. How bad will it be with work 8 or 9? Accessibility and functionality really take a hit then. The columnar format is a squeezed with that.
And then there is expanding this template. That make tings a bit clunky and redundant - Nick Fury would be repeated 6 times and most of the others at least twice. It also implies that either the "Characters" have/will have appeared in all 6 films or that they should be split up with a section in each column for the character(s) specific to that film.
The columns though imply that something is "missing" if each one doesn't have a game, or an album, or a soundtrack, or score listed. Iron Man under the video game group is fairly obviously linked to the film titled Iron Man. Or a reader reading the links in a navbox. Realistically, making a clear linkage between a film, its score, its sound track, and its spin-off game is a function of the film article. That is commented upon and you change tact that the X-Men example is irrelevant because the content is so different. You bring up the X-Men template as an example of what this template should look like. This helps to identify connections between films and their merchandise. The format on this page would add a significant amount of functionality because each film has a game and a soundtrack unlike X-Men. J Greb ( talk) 10:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC) This page is not for X-Men template. This adds zero to the functionality of the templates. 139.168.140.27 ( talk) 07:19, 23 June 2011 (UTC) Actually the unilateral change to the X-Men template in May should be undone. Similar formats are currently used for Transformers and X-Men. ONEder Boy ( talk) 21:50, (UTC) I'd like to discuss changing the template back to the format back to one similar to this. Why did somebody change it back to the original format? I thought that it looked better when it was based on the Transformers (film series) template. Should the other characters? - Preceding unsigned comment added by Caged halo ( talk
What about characters like Justin Hammer, Ho Yinsen, Betty Ross, Doc Samson, Samuel Sterns, Jane Foster, Warriors Three, Sif, Odin, Heimdall, Frigga, Bucky, Dum Dum Dugan, Arnim Zola and Peggy Carter?
Iron man 2 soundtrack archive movie#
KONG: THE ART OF THE ULTIMATE BATTLE ROYALE BOOK REVIEW | STAR WARS: THRAWN ASCENDANCY THE GREATER GOOD BOOK REVIEW | GODZILLA VS KONG THE OFFICIAL MOVIE NOVELIZATION STAR WARS ADVENTURES VOL. BOOK REVIEW | MARVEL BLACK WIDOW: SECRETS OF A SUPER SPY BOOK REVIEW | STAR WARS: GALACTIC BAKING THE OFFICIAL COOKBOOK BOOK REVIEW | GODZILLA VS.
0 kommentar(er)
